Peet (P S J ) Schutte

The Absolute Relevance of Singularity Peet (P S J ) Schutte

In the precise middle of all objects in rotation is a precise centre dividing the object in sectors that will start the spinning initiation from that centre point. Thus, the spinning object will have a middle point, a very specific centre point that does not spin and only holds P as a specific value. One value such a line cannot have is zero because zero does not start any line and therefore the value of the line must be infinite, just as described in accordance and by the definition of singularity That point albeit hypothetical, is also as much a reality none the less and is placed where that point must be standing still because every line running from that point in opposing directions are also in opposing directional spin the other or opposing side. In considering the spinning motion in the fraction of time in the detailed instant every aspect of rotation will turn in every instant of change in time. The fact of the graph proves my point in quarterly opposing dimensions and values, When rotation begins, the line shrinks back to a hypothetical position claiming zero spin that is not less distinct but more distinct because from that point every rotating piece of what ever is then spinning will clearly carry the singularity value of P implicating rotation A top can spin but the parameters of its spin are limiting the motion it can apply. By not spinning the top is still spinning as the Earth is doing the spinning on its behalf. When spinning too fast the top fights something because the alignment keeping it upright starts to tarnish. The same apply when spinning too slowly but that makes sense. With the reply of no it would not comes an admitting that the process involves the interacting of singularity of the earth with the singularity of the top where the spinning created independent singularity, as valid as that of the earth because the earth has a role in sustaining it or destroying it at the border ends. Using the concept that gravity applies P as the circle factor P as well as P2 replacing r2 the replacing by P brings two values as P and P2. In order to create a distinction I remained using r as the indicator of the cube or non-circle that has vacant space and by vacant space I refer to non-solid structures. Pinpoint positioning of singularity P0 with P positioning space to either side forming the border set by singularity in constant directional change as time flows through rotation The new direction pointing to a new location in relation to the previous point will oppose the previous point it had in relation to direction considering the centre point. Looking at the affect of gravity it shows the precise quality of no distinctive point, as gravity never seems to end at a point but flows all over affecting all that holds a position in its sphere of influence. The value of singularity stems directly from the law of Pythagoras or Pythagoras is the result of the average of singularity. With the shortest line being a dot, all lines must start from a position implicating P. A circle is a square without corners implementing P and a half circle is therefore a triangle without corners. When replacing the value we normally attach to circle being r with P, the law of Pythagoras becomes quite meaningful and mathematical. The triangle, the half circle and the straight -line are of mutual value, as they are all 1800 and part of singularity. By placing a connecting circle on the sides of the triangle half a circle forms. By implicating P as a relevancy and not the straight-line r, two values of P applies to each circle, and the straight line is no longer r, but is P2. By adding the two half squares forming the two half circles and then calculating the square root of the total that then forms the average diameter, an average of P in the connecting line will come about. As both lines are the straight line forming singularity coming from one line being P, the connecting line then must be the average of the two lines as P2.